Now:Suggest a Topic - Revision history

Rossdonaldson1: Text replacement - "r/o" to "rule out"

2016-07-31T13:07:31Z

Text replacement - "r/o" to "rule out"

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:07, 31 July 2016
Line 15:		Line 15:
	*tPA in PE subsets		*tPA in PE subsets
	*Discharge of Newly Diagnosed Pulmonary Embolism From the ED		*Discharge of Newly Diagnosed Pulmonary Embolism From the ED
	*CTA vs V/Q in pregnant patients needing PE ~~r/o~~		*CTA vs V/Q in pregnant patients needing PE rule out
	*NEXUS vs. Canadian c-spine rules		*NEXUS vs. Canadian c-spine rules
	*[[EBQ:Nasogastric aspiration and lavage in emergency department patients with hematochezia or melena without hematemesis\|Use of NG-lavage with upper GI bleeding]]		*[[EBQ:Nasogastric aspiration and lavage in emergency department patients with hematochezia or melena without hematemesis\|Use of NG-lavage with upper GI bleeding]]

Ostermayer: Text replacement - " pts" to " patients"

2016-06-21T16:50:37Z

Text replacement - " pts" to " patients"

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:50, 21 June 2016
Line 15:		Line 15:
	*tPA in PE subsets		*tPA in PE subsets
	*Discharge of Newly Diagnosed Pulmonary Embolism From the ED		*Discharge of Newly Diagnosed Pulmonary Embolism From the ED
	*CTA vs V/Q in pregnant ~~pts~~ needing PE r/o		*CTA vs V/Q in pregnant patients needing PE r/o
	*NEXUS vs. Canadian c-spine rules		*NEXUS vs. Canadian c-spine rules
	*[[EBQ:Nasogastric aspiration and lavage in emergency department patients with hematochezia or melena without hematemesis\|Use of NG-lavage with upper GI bleeding]]		*[[EBQ:Nasogastric aspiration and lavage in emergency department patients with hematochezia or melena without hematemesis\|Use of NG-lavage with upper GI bleeding]]

Rossdonaldson1: /* Potential Topics */

2015-03-08T19:08:46Z

Potential Topics

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:08, 8 March 2015
Line 18:		Line 18:
	*NEXUS vs. Canadian c-spine rules		*NEXUS vs. Canadian c-spine rules
	*[[EBQ:Nasogastric aspiration and lavage in emergency department patients with hematochezia or melena without hematemesis\|Use of NG-lavage with upper GI bleeding]]		*[[EBQ:Nasogastric aspiration and lavage in emergency department patients with hematochezia or melena without hematemesis\|Use of NG-lavage with upper GI bleeding]]
	*[[EBQ:Outpatient use of benzodiazepines for the treatment of alcohol withdrawl\|Outpatient use of benzodiazepines for the treatment of alcohol withdrawl]]		*[[EBQ:Outpatient use of benzodiazepines for the treatment of acute alcohol withdrawl\|Outpatient use of benzodiazepines for the treatment of acute alcohol withdrawl]]

	==See Also==		==See Also==

Rossdonaldson1: /* Potential Topics */

2015-03-08T19:08:13Z

Potential Topics

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:08, 8 March 2015
Line 18:		Line 18:
	*NEXUS vs. Canadian c-spine rules		*NEXUS vs. Canadian c-spine rules
	*[[EBQ:Nasogastric aspiration and lavage in emergency department patients with hematochezia or melena without hematemesis\|Use of NG-lavage with upper GI bleeding]]		*[[EBQ:Nasogastric aspiration and lavage in emergency department patients with hematochezia or melena without hematemesis\|Use of NG-lavage with upper GI bleeding]]
	*[[EBQ:Outpatient use of benzodiazepines for the treatment of alcohol withdrawl]]		*[[EBQ:Outpatient use of benzodiazepines for the treatment of alcohol withdrawl\|Outpatient use of benzodiazepines for the treatment of alcohol withdrawl]]

	==See Also==		==See Also==

Rossdonaldson1: /* Potential Topics */

2015-03-08T19:07:40Z

Potential Topics

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:07, 8 March 2015
Line 18:		Line 18:
	*NEXUS vs. Canadian c-spine rules		*NEXUS vs. Canadian c-spine rules
	*[[EBQ:Nasogastric aspiration and lavage in emergency department patients with hematochezia or melena without hematemesis\|Use of NG-lavage with upper GI bleeding]]		*[[EBQ:Nasogastric aspiration and lavage in emergency department patients with hematochezia or melena without hematemesis\|Use of NG-lavage with upper GI bleeding]]
			*[[EBQ:Outpatient use of benzodiazepines for the treatment of alcohol withdrawl]]

	==See Also==		==See Also==

Rossdonaldson1: /* Potential Topics */

2015-02-11T02:33:03Z

Potential Topics

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:33, 11 February 2015
Line 17:		Line 17:
	*CTA vs V/Q in pregnant pts needing PE r/o		*CTA vs V/Q in pregnant pts needing PE r/o
	*NEXUS vs. Canadian c-spine rules		*NEXUS vs. Canadian c-spine rules
			*[[EBQ:Nasogastric aspiration and lavage in emergency department patients with hematochezia or melena without hematemesis\|Use of NG-lavage with upper GI bleeding]]

	==See Also==		==See Also==

Rossdonaldson1: /* Potential Topics */

2015-02-11T02:30:11Z

Potential Topics

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:30, 11 February 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:

	==Potential Topics==		==Potential Topics==
			;Post potential topics here, with link to EBQ page if currently present
	*Octreotide for upper GI bleed		*Octreotide for upper GI bleed
	*Metoprolol vs. diltiazem in for A. fib with RVR		*Metoprolol vs. diltiazem in for A. fib with RVR
	*Kayexelate for patients with hyperkalemia in renal failure		*[[EBQ:Use of Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate (Kayexylate) in Hyperkalemia\|Kayexelate for patients with hyperkalemia in renal failure]]
	*tPA use in acute CVA		*tPA use in acute CVA
	*tPA in PE subsets		*tPA in PE subsets

Rossdonaldson1 at 02:27, 11 February 2015

2015-02-11T02:27:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:27, 11 February 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Background==		==Background==
	[[WikEM-Now]] is ~~an idea for cro~~		This is the page to suggest controversial emergency medicine issues for us to pilot on [[WikEM-Now]]. The ideal (at least initial) topics are ones in which:
			*there is true debate in the literature
			*there currently lacks a clear management guideline
			*and, in which doctors have to actually make a decision in real life.

			The evidence may be unclear, but that does not stop us from having to choose an option. Theoretical debates are not of interest.
	Please insert here suggestions on controversial issues in EM for us to pilot. The ideal (at least initial) topics are ones in which there is true debate in the literature, there currently lacks a clear management guideline, and in which doctors have to actually make a decision in real life. The evidence may be unclear, but that does not stop us from having to choose an option. Theoretical debates are not of interest.

	Please email me back with suggestions on controversial issues in EM for us to pilot. The ideal (at least initial) topics are ones in which there is true debate in the literature, but in which doctors have to actually make a decision in real life. The evidence may be unclear, but that does not stop us from having to choose an option. Theoretical debates are not of interest. Some of my initial thoughts on potential topics are:

	~~-Octreotide for upper GI bleed~~
	~~-Metoprolol vs. diltiazem in for A. fib with RVR~~
	~~-Kayexelate for patients with hyperkalemia in renal failure~~
	~~-tPA use in acute CVA~~
	~~-tPA in PE subsets~~
	~~-Discharge of Newly Diagnosed Pulmonary Embolism From the ED~~

	==Potential Topics==		==Potential Topics==

Rossdonaldson1 at 02:21, 11 February 2015

2015-02-11T02:21:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:21, 11 February 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Background==		==Background==
	WikEM-Now is an idea for cro		[[WikEM-Now]] is an idea for cro


	Please insert here suggestions on controversial issues in EM for us to pilot. The ideal (at least initial) topics are ones in which there is true debate in the literature, there currently lacks a clear management guideline, and in which doctors have to actually make a decision in real life. The evidence may be unclear, but that does not stop us from having to choose an option. Theoretical debates are not of interest.		Please insert here suggestions on controversial issues in EM for us to pilot. The ideal (at least initial) topics are ones in which there is true debate in the literature, there currently lacks a clear management guideline, and in which doctors have to actually make a decision in real life. The evidence may be unclear, but that does not stop us from having to choose an option. Theoretical debates are not of interest.

			Please email me back with suggestions on controversial issues in EM for us to pilot. The ideal (at least initial) topics are ones in which there is true debate in the literature, but in which doctors have to actually make a decision in real life. The evidence may be unclear, but that does not stop us from having to choose an option. Theoretical debates are not of interest. Some of my initial thoughts on potential topics are:

			-Octreotide for upper GI bleed
			-Metoprolol vs. diltiazem in for A. fib with RVR
			-Kayexelate for patients with hyperkalemia in renal failure
			-tPA use in acute CVA
			-tPA in PE subsets
			-Discharge of Newly Diagnosed Pulmonary Embolism From the ED

	==Potential Topics==		==Potential Topics==

Rossdonaldson1: /* Potential Topics */

2015-02-11T02:18:02Z

Potential Topics

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:18, 11 February 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==Background==
			WikEM-Now is an idea for cro


			Please insert here suggestions on controversial issues in EM for us to pilot. The ideal (at least initial) topics are ones in which there is true debate in the literature, there currently lacks a clear management guideline, and in which doctors have to actually make a decision in real life. The evidence may be unclear, but that does not stop us from having to choose an option. Theoretical debates are not of interest.

	==Potential Topics==		==Potential Topics==
	Please insert here suggestions on controversial issues in EM for us to pilot. The ideal (at least initial) topics are ones in which there is true debate in the literature, there currently lacks a clear management guideline, and in which doctors have to actually make a decision in real life. The evidence may be unclear, but that does not stop us from having to choose an option. Theoretical debates are not of interest. Some of my initial thoughts on potential topics are:

	*Octreotide for upper GI bleed		*Octreotide for upper GI bleed
	*Metoprolol vs. diltiazem in for A. fib with RVR		*Metoprolol vs. diltiazem in for A. fib with RVR
Line 10:		Line 14:
	*CTA vs V/Q in pregnant pts needing PE r/o		*CTA vs V/Q in pregnant pts needing PE r/o
	*NEXUS vs. Canadian c-spine rules		*NEXUS vs. Canadian c-spine rules

			==See Also==
			*[[Now:Main]]

	[[Category:WikEM]]		[[Category:WikEM]]