CT before lumbar puncture: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
LP without CT is likely safe if: | LP without CT is likely safe if: | ||
# History | |||
## Age < 60 | |||
## Not immunocompromised | |||
## No history of CNS disease | |||
## No seizure within 1 week of presentation | |||
# Physical Exam | |||
## No ALOC | |||
## No inability to answer two consecutive questions successfully | |||
## No inability to follow two consecutive commands successfully | |||
## No gaze palsy | |||
## No abnormal visual fields | |||
## No facial palsy | |||
## No arm drift | |||
## No leg drift | |||
## No abnormal language | |||
If none of the above, chance of normal ct is 97%, none of the patients herniated | |||
CT before LP often results in longer average delay to abx | |||
==Source== | |||
Source | |||
NEJM 2001; 345; 1727-33 | NEJM 2001; 345; 1727-33 | ||
[[Category:Neuro]] | [[Category:Neuro]] | ||
[[Category:Procedure]] | |||
Revision as of 06:21, 28 March 2011
LP without CT is likely safe if:
- History
- Age < 60
- Not immunocompromised
- No history of CNS disease
- No seizure within 1 week of presentation
- Physical Exam
- No ALOC
- No inability to answer two consecutive questions successfully
- No inability to follow two consecutive commands successfully
- No gaze palsy
- No abnormal visual fields
- No facial palsy
- No arm drift
- No leg drift
- No abnormal language
If none of the above, chance of normal ct is 97%, none of the patients herniated
CT before LP often results in longer average delay to abx
Source
NEJM 2001; 345; 1727-33
