Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: Difference between revisions

Line 29: Line 29:


==Equipment Needed==
==Equipment Needed==
*Foley catheter and nasogastric tube must be placed prior to performing DPL to avoid injuring the bladder or stomach
*Foley catheter and nasogastric tube
*Local anesthesia with 1% [[lidocaine]] with epinephrine generally provides adequate anesthesia
**Place prior to DPL to decrease risk of injury to bladder or stomach
*Several kits are commercially available
*Local anesthetic
**If not, may use tray for abdominal access for laparoscopy with a rigid peritoneal dialysis catheter
**1% [[lidocaine]] with epinephrine
*Commercial DPL kit
**Alternately, abdominal access kit for laparoscopy and rigid peritoneal dialysis catheter


==Procedure==
==Procedure==

Revision as of 22:01, 15 May 2019

Overview

  • Largely historical significance
    • Supplanted by FAST and CT[1]
    • Can be done at bedside, but is invasive
    • Historical gold standard for evaluation of intra-peritoneal bleed in abdominal trauma

Two part procedure

  1. Diagnostic peritoneal aspiration (DPA)
    • Fluid aspirated from peritoneal cavity for analysis
  2. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL)
    • Fluid instilled into peritoneal cavity, then drained for analysis

Indications

  • Evaluation for intra-peritoneal hemorrhage in hemodynamically unstable patient when FAST and CT are not available or appropriate
    • Blunt abdominal trauma
    • Tangential gunshot wounds
  • Aid in diagnosis of diaphragmatic injury
  • Evaluation for peritoneal penetration of flank and anterior abdominal stab wounds when local wound exploration inconclusive

Contraindications

Absolute

  • Clear indication for immediate laparotomy

Relative

  • Prior abdominal operations
  • Coagulopathy
  • Advanced cirrhosis
  • Morbid obesity

Equipment Needed

  • Foley catheter and nasogastric tube
    • Place prior to DPL to decrease risk of injury to bladder or stomach
  • Local anesthetic
  • Commercial DPL kit
    • Alternately, abdominal access kit for laparoscopy and rigid peritoneal dialysis catheter

Procedure

Abdominal access

  • Insertion sites
    • Infraumbilical (2 cm below) location is the standard site
    • Supraumbilical insertion site is preferred in pregnant trauma patient or in the presence of a pelvic fracture
    • Periumbilical site
  • Open method
    • All three layers (skin, fascia, peritoneum) are opened under direct vision
    • Method of choice when precise insertion of the catheter is critical
      • Patient with pelvic fracture, to avoid large hematoma that may be tracking anteriorly
      • Pregnant patient
  • Semi-open method
    • Fascia is opened under direct vision
    • Then Seldinger technique used where a needle is used to penetrate the peritoneum, wire passed through the needle, and the catheter is advanced over the wire.
  • Closed method
    • A small nick is made through the skin
    • Then Seldinger technique used where the needle is blindly passed through the linea alba and the peritoneum
    • The wire and catheter are then inserted following the same method as above.
    • Faster, but greater risk of complications and catheter malposition
    • Avoid this method in the presence of a pelvic fracture or prior midline incision

Diagnostic peritoneal aspiration (DPA)

  • Aspiration of >10mL of blood or enteric contest is considered grossly positive, instillation of the lavage fluid is not necessary

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL)

  • If no fluid or <10mL fluid is aspirated, instill 1L of warm NS into abdomen, then immediately allow to drain passively
  • Important not to separate catheter and tubing when transitioning from instillation to removal
  • Fluid analysis is performed on a sample of the returned fluid
  • Optimally, most of the liter should be returned but analysis can be performed on as little as 300 cc of the returned fluid

Diagnostic Criteria

  • Blunt abdominal trauma
    • RBC >100,000/mm3
    • WBC >500/mm3
    • Elevated fluid amylase
    • Presence of enteric contents or bacteria
  • Penetrating abdominal trauma (controversial)
    • RBC >1000/mm3
    • WBC >500/mm3
  • Results from cell analysis take 30 to 60 minutes
    • If an immediate decision is necessary, may use the density of cells in the IV tubing
    • If text can be read through the tubing it can be considered unofficially negative until the official cell counts return.
    • If the density of cells in the tubing is so high that you cannot read through it, then it can be considered a positive lavage.

Complications

  • Catheter misplacement
  • Hemorrhage
  • Intraabdominal or retroperitoneal organ injury
  • Wound infection

See Also

External Links

{{#widget:YouTube|id=O9BZamRlXVA}}

References

  1. Pryor JP. Nonoperative management of abdominal gunshot wounds. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;43(3):344-53.