STEMI equivalents: Difference between revisions
Neil.m.young (talk | contribs) (reduce size) |
(→Posterior MI: changed posterior ekg finding from 1mm to 0.5mm STE) |
||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
* | *STEMI typically defined by<ref>ECC Committee, Subcommittees and Task Forces of the American Heart Association.. 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care — Part 8: Stabilization of the Patient With Acute Coronary Syndromes. Circulation. 2005. 112 (24_suppl):IV–89–IV–110. 2005.</ref>: | ||
**≥1 mm (0.1 mV) | **≥1 mm (0.1 mV) ST segment elevation in limb leads | ||
**≥ 2 mm elevation in | **≥ 2 mm ST segment elevation in precordial leads | ||
* | **Findings present in at least 2 anatomically contiguous leads | ||
*Several variations from the classic STEMI ECG changes are similarly concerning and considered 'STEMI equivalent' | |||
==STEMI Equivalents== | ==STEMI Equivalents== | ||
| Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
*RCA (90%), LCA (10%) | *RCA (90%), LCA (10%) | ||
*12-Lead ECG findings<ref>Van Gorselen EO, et al. Posterior myocardial infarction: the dark side of the moon. Neth Heart J. 2007; 15:16-21.</ref> | *12-Lead ECG findings<ref>Van Gorselen EO, et al. Posterior myocardial infarction: the dark side of the moon. Neth Heart J. 2007; 15:16-21.</ref> | ||
**ST-segment depression (horizontal >> downsloping/upsloping | **ST-segment depression (horizontal >> downsloping/upsloping) | ||
**Prominent and broad R wave (>30ms) | **Prominent and broad R wave (>30ms) | ||
**Relative tall R waves in precordial leads (may find R = S amplitude in V1) | |||
**R/S wave ratio >1.0 in lead V2 | **R/S wave ratio >1.0 in lead V2 | ||
**Prominent, upright T wave | **Prominent, upright T wave | ||
| Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
**V9: Left paraspinal area line along the 5th ICS | **V9: Left paraspinal area line along the 5th ICS | ||
*Posterior ECG findings | *Posterior ECG findings | ||
** | **≥0.5 mm ST-segment elevation | ||
[[File:Posterior MI.jpg| | [[File:Posterior MI.jpg|350px]] | ||
===LMCA Occlusion=== | ===LMCA Occlusion=== | ||
*Seen with | *Seen with left main artery lesion<ref>Hennings JR and Fesmire FM. A new electrocardiographic criteria for emergent reperfusion therapy. Am J Emerg Med. 2012; 30(6):994–1000.</ref> | ||
* | *Also reported in proximal LAD lesions and severe multivessel coronary artery disease | ||
*12-Lead ECG findings | *12-Lead ECG findings | ||
**ST elevation in aVR ≥ 1mm | **ST elevation in aVR ≥ 1mm | ||
**ST elevation in aVR ≥ V1 | **ST elevation in aVR ≥ V1 | ||
**ST depression typically seen in lateral | **ST depression typically seen in lateral | ||
[[File:AVR.jpg|350px]] | |||
===[[De Winter’s T Waves]]=== | ===[[De Winter’s T Waves]]=== | ||
* | *Suggests proximal LAD lesion | ||
*12-Lead ECG findings<ref>de Winter R, et al. A new ECG sign of proximal LAD occlusion. NEJM. 2008; 359:2071–2073.</ref> | *12-Lead ECG findings<ref>de Winter R, et al. A new ECG sign of proximal LAD occlusion. NEJM. 2008; 359:2071–2073.</ref> | ||
**Precordial ST-segment depression at the J-point | **Precordial ST-segment depression at the J-point | ||
| Line 46: | Line 49: | ||
**ST elevation ≥5 mm in a lead with downward (discordant) QRS complex - 2 points | **ST elevation ≥5 mm in a lead with downward (discordant) QRS complex - 2 points | ||
*Smith's modification<ref>Smith, S, et al. Diagnosis of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Presence of Left Bundle Branch Block With the ST-Elevation to S-Wave Ratio in a Modified Sgarbossa Rule. 60(6):766-776.</ref> | *Smith's modification<ref>Smith, S, et al. Diagnosis of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Presence of Left Bundle Branch Block With the ST-Elevation to S-Wave Ratio in a Modified Sgarbossa Rule. 60(6):766-776.</ref> | ||
**Changes the 3rd rule of original Sgarbossa's Criteria to be ST depression OR elevation discordant | **Changes the 3rd rule of original Sgarbossa's Criteria to be ST depression '''OR''' elevation discordant with the QRS complex and with a magnitude of at least 25% of the QRS increases Sn from 52% to 91% at the expense of reducing Sp from 98% to 90%[ | ||
[[File:Sgarbossa.jpg|350px]] | [[File:Sgarbossa.jpg|350px]] | ||
===[[Wellens’ Syndrome]]=== | ===[[Wellens’ Syndrome]]=== | ||
*ECG findings in absence of chest pain, but with recent cardiac chest pain symptoms | *[[ECG]] findings in absence of chest pain, but with recent cardiac chest pain symptoms | ||
*Represents critical stenosis of the LAD | *Represents critical stenosis of the LAD | ||
* | *Requires PCI in the next 24-48hr (may evolve more rapidly - observe with serial ECGs) | ||
*12-Lead ECG findings<ref>Rhinehardt J, et al. Electrocardiographic manifestations of Wellens' syndrome. Am J Emerg Med. 2002; 20(7):638-43.</ref> | *12-Lead ECG findings<ref>Rhinehardt J, et al. Electrocardiographic manifestations of Wellens' syndrome. Am J Emerg Med. 2002; 20(7):638-43.</ref> | ||
**Deeply-inverted or biphasic T waves in V2-3 | **Deeply-inverted or biphasic T waves in V2-3 | ||
| Line 58: | Line 61: | ||
**Absent precordial Q waves with preserved R waves | **Absent precordial Q waves with preserved R waves | ||
*Two T wave characteristics: | *Two T wave characteristics: | ||
**Type A: | **Type A: Biphasic pattern - 25% - Biphasic T-waves | ||
**Type B: | **Type B: Inversion pattern - 75% - Deeply inverted and symmetric T-waves | ||
[[File:Wellens.jpg|350px]] | [[File:Wellens.jpg|350px]] | ||
| Line 65: | Line 68: | ||
===[[LBBB|New LBBB]]=== | ===[[LBBB|New LBBB]]=== | ||
*New LBBB alone is no longer a reason to activate the cath lab<ref>Jain S, et al. Utility of left bundle branch block as a diagnostic criterion for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2011; 107:1111-1116.</ref> | *New LBBB alone is no longer a reason to activate the cath lab<ref>Jain S, et al. Utility of left bundle branch block as a diagnostic criterion for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2011; 107:1111-1116.</ref> | ||
*However, careful | *However, careful workup for ACS should be taken for symptomatic patients with LBBB | ||
*12-Lead ECG findings | *12-Lead ECG findings | ||
**QRS > 0.12 in limb leads | **QRS > 0.12 in limb leads | ||
| Line 71: | Line 74: | ||
***Large and wide R waves — leads I, aVL, V5, and V6 | ***Large and wide R waves — leads I, aVL, V5, and V6 | ||
***Small R wave followed by deep S wave —leads II, III, aVF, V1–V3 | ***Small R wave followed by deep S wave —leads II, III, aVF, V1–V3 | ||
[[File:LBBB.jpg|350px]] | |||
==External Links== | |||
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxPgcPEqI5k Amal Mattu ECG Case: April 29 2012] | |||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
*[[ST- | *[[ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction]] | ||
*[[Acute Coronary Syndrome (Main)]] | *[[Acute Coronary Syndrome (Main)]] | ||
*[[Chest pain]] | *[[Chest pain]] | ||
*[[ECG (Main)]] | *[[ECG (Main)]] | ||
== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Cardiology]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:23, 5 November 2020
Background
- STEMI typically defined by[1]:
- ≥1 mm (0.1 mV) ST segment elevation in limb leads
- ≥ 2 mm ST segment elevation in precordial leads
- Findings present in at least 2 anatomically contiguous leads
- Several variations from the classic STEMI ECG changes are similarly concerning and considered 'STEMI equivalent'
STEMI Equivalents
Posterior MI
- RCA (90%), LCA (10%)
- 12-Lead ECG findings[2]
- ST-segment depression (horizontal >> downsloping/upsloping)
- Prominent and broad R wave (>30ms)
- Relative tall R waves in precordial leads (may find R = S amplitude in V1)
- R/S wave ratio >1.0 in lead V2
- Prominent, upright T wave
- Combination of horizontal ST-segment depression with upright T wave
- Posterior ECG or 15-lead ECG may be helpful
- V7: Left posterior axillary line along the 5th ICS
- V8: Tip of the left scapula line along the 5th ICS
- V9: Left paraspinal area line along the 5th ICS
- Posterior ECG findings
- ≥0.5 mm ST-segment elevation
LMCA Occlusion
- Seen with left main artery lesion[3]
- Also reported in proximal LAD lesions and severe multivessel coronary artery disease
- 12-Lead ECG findings
- ST elevation in aVR ≥ 1mm
- ST elevation in aVR ≥ V1
- ST depression typically seen in lateral
De Winter’s T Waves
- Suggests proximal LAD lesion
- 12-Lead ECG findings[4]
- Precordial ST-segment depression at the J-point
- Tall, peaked, symmetric T waves in the precordial leads
- Lead aVR shows slight ST-segment elevation in most cases
Sgarbossa's Criteria
- Used to identify STEMI in the setting of LBBB or pacemaker
- Original Criteria[5]
- ≥3 points = 98% probability of STEMI
- ST elevation ≥1 mm in a lead with upward (concordant) QRS complex - 5 points
- ST depression ≥1 mm in lead V1, V2, or V3 - 3 points
- ST elevation ≥5 mm in a lead with downward (discordant) QRS complex - 2 points
- Smith's modification[6]
- Changes the 3rd rule of original Sgarbossa's Criteria to be ST depression OR elevation discordant with the QRS complex and with a magnitude of at least 25% of the QRS increases Sn from 52% to 91% at the expense of reducing Sp from 98% to 90%[
Wellens’ Syndrome
- ECG findings in absence of chest pain, but with recent cardiac chest pain symptoms
- Represents critical stenosis of the LAD
- Requires PCI in the next 24-48hr (may evolve more rapidly - observe with serial ECGs)
- 12-Lead ECG findings[7]
- Deeply-inverted or biphasic T waves in V2-3
- Isoelectric or minimally-elevated ST segment (<1 mm)
- Absent precordial Q waves with preserved R waves
- Two T wave characteristics:
- Type A: Biphasic pattern - 25% - Biphasic T-waves
- Type B: Inversion pattern - 75% - Deeply inverted and symmetric T-waves
No Longer STEMI Equivalents
New LBBB
- New LBBB alone is no longer a reason to activate the cath lab[8]
- However, careful workup for ACS should be taken for symptomatic patients with LBBB
- 12-Lead ECG findings
- QRS > 0.12 in limb leads
- Leads
- Large and wide R waves — leads I, aVL, V5, and V6
- Small R wave followed by deep S wave —leads II, III, aVF, V1–V3
External Links
See Also
References
- ↑ ECC Committee, Subcommittees and Task Forces of the American Heart Association.. 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care — Part 8: Stabilization of the Patient With Acute Coronary Syndromes. Circulation. 2005. 112 (24_suppl):IV–89–IV–110. 2005.
- ↑ Van Gorselen EO, et al. Posterior myocardial infarction: the dark side of the moon. Neth Heart J. 2007; 15:16-21.
- ↑ Hennings JR and Fesmire FM. A new electrocardiographic criteria for emergent reperfusion therapy. Am J Emerg Med. 2012; 30(6):994–1000.
- ↑ de Winter R, et al. A new ECG sign of proximal LAD occlusion. NEJM. 2008; 359:2071–2073.
- ↑ Sgarbossa E, et al.. "Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators". NEJM. 1996; 334(8):481-7.
- ↑ Smith, S, et al. Diagnosis of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Presence of Left Bundle Branch Block With the ST-Elevation to S-Wave Ratio in a Modified Sgarbossa Rule. 60(6):766-776.
- ↑ Rhinehardt J, et al. Electrocardiographic manifestations of Wellens' syndrome. Am J Emerg Med. 2002; 20(7):638-43.
- ↑ Jain S, et al. Utility of left bundle branch block as a diagnostic criterion for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2011; 107:1111-1116.
